Top 10 most important leaders of Hollywood actors of all time

!9# Top 10 most important leaders of Hollywood actors of all time

[if ]

[endif]

By putting together this Top 10 list of most important leading Hollywood actors of all time I have tried to be as objective as possible (for instance my personal favorite actor is Robert Mitchum, who's 10th on this list) by applying the following criteria: the importance of their specific roles, the variety of their oeuvre, their influence on other actors (as far as can be traced) and the directors they worked with. O.K. Let's get started:

10) Robert Mitchum (1917-1997)

Robert Mitchum known for his apparent laconic acting. Besides his excellent performances in the Film-noirs (Crossfire (1947),Out of the Past (1947)) and Westerns (Man With the Gun (1955), Rio Bravo (1959), El Dorado (1966)) of the Fifties he's probably best known for his portrayals of the sadistic psychopaths in Charles Laughton's Night of the Hunter (1955) and in J.L. Thompson's Cape Fear (1961) which were both tangibly sordid performances and among his best. Mitchum saw acting as a profession and considered being a star as a thing of minor importance. When he turned down the leading role in Sam Peckinpah's The Wild Bunch (1969) and instead played a comparable role in Henry Hathaway's 5 Card Stud (1968) as he did in Night of the Hunter, he claimed that both are Westerns.

9) Robert de Niro (1943)

The cooperation between Robert de Niro and his friend and director Martin Scorsese was crucial to the success of both artists. In their first project together Mean Streets (1973), about a group of young adolescents in New York struggling to make a living out of loan-sharking, de Niro (who's educated in the "method acting style") steals the show as the violent and unpredictable Johnny Boy. Their real breakthrough came with Taxi Driver in 1976, in which de Niro played the introverted Vietnam vet Travis Bickle, who roams the streets in his cab, slowly transforming into a horrible avenger on the derailed world he witnesses. De Niro won his second Oscar (The Godfather II (1974), his first as Supporting Actor) for his role as the legendary boxer Jake LaMotta in Raging Bull (after persuading Scorsese to direct the film). His best films of the Nineties are without a doubt Goodfellas (1990) and Heat (1995). In the first De Niro is perfectly cast by Scorsese as the middle-aged Irish hood of considerable ruthlessness and repute who is Ray Liotta's mentor, Jim Conway. In Michael Mann's masterly crime epic Heat he plays the master criminal Neil McGauley cast opposite (for the first time in a film together) to the other movie icon Al Pacino as his cop nemisis. In Quentin Tarantino's Jackie Brown (1997) De Niro underplayed, that way giving his colleagues more space to excel.

8) Burt Lancaster (1913-1994)

Burt Lancaster's film career started in the Forties in the stifling melodrama's of Robert Siodmark (The Killers (1946), Criss Cross (1949). After some "light" films in the early Fifties he returned to the genre of Film-noir in the dark film Sweet Smell of Success (1957) in which he played the cynical and powerful columnist J.J. Hunsecker who destroys his sister's relationship with her boyfriend. Also memorable is his role in Birdman of Alcatraz (1962) and his Oscar winning performance in Elmer Gantry (1960). Lancaster also build an impressive career in Europe where he worked with the Italian directors Luchino Visconti (The Leopard and The Conversation Piece) and Bernardo Bertolucci (1900). His last important role was in Louis Malle's masterpiece Atlantic City U.S.A. (1980)

7) James Stewart (1908-1997)

James Stewart, the long thin man with his famous drawling voice has been an important leading actor for thirty years and a modest and beloved star. His first striking performance was in Mr Smith Goes to Washington (1939) by Frank Capra in which he played a gangly, shy and idealistic senator who exposes corruption. The Fifties has been his most decisive period of his acting career. His startling performances in Anthony Mann's Westerns (they made 5 together) in which he mainly personified grim and cynical men (The Naked Spur (1953) and especially The Man From Laramie (1955)) are diametrically opposite to most of his work before and after this series of films. Stewart made four films with the suspense maestro Alfred Hitchcock. The two finest (for probably both the actor and director) are the magnificently staged Rear Window (1954), with Stewart as the immobilised photographer who has a broken leg and witnesses a murder while looking through his binoculars and the enigmatic and bleak mystery Vertigo (1958) in which he portrayed a neurotic detective who falls in love with his friend's wandering wife whom he has to trail. The old Hollywood star brought a level of neurotic energy to his best roles that few Method actors could match.

6) Montgomery Clift (1920-1966)

"He's a little queer, don't you think so?" John Wayne remarked to his secretary after meeting Montgomery Clift his co-star in Red River (1948). Later, when the film was finished he was won over by the great professionalism of the young "method" actor. When Clift was 15 he already played small professional roles. With his slender stature, thin face and expressive eyes he soon became a romantic hero, especially when persistent rumors arose about a relationship with Elizabeth Taylor. With her he co-starred in three films (A Place in the Sun (1951), Raintree Country (1957) and Suddenly, Last Summer (1959) and they remained friends for the rest of his life. In the Fifties Clift was the most sought after actor but he was very reluctant and critical on the roles he chose. During the production of Raintree Countree Clift had a terrible car accident, which damaged him both physically and emotionally. His life after that has been described as the longest suicide in the history of Hollywood (alcohol and drug addiction). Despite of his addiction he continued acting and had some memorable and heartbreaking performances in Judgment at Nuremberg (1961) and The Misfits (1961). He was nominated for an Academy award four times and died from a heart attack at the young age of 46 years old.

5) Henry Fonda (1905-1982)

Henry Fonda embodied integrity on the screen (and also in his personal life). Almost all the characters he portrayed breathed dignity, from the young farmer leading his family in John Ford's Grapes of Wrath (1940), the drifter Gil carter defending a convict against an excited mob in William Wellman's The Oxbow Incident (1943), Wyatt Earp in My Darling Clementine (1946), the musician Manny Balestrero wrongfully accused of murder in Alfred Hitchock's The Wrong Man (1957) and Juror #8 in Twelve Angry Men (1957). In Sergio Leone's Once Upon a Time in the West (1968) he proofed he also could play a depraved and unscrupulous villain. The only "flaw" in his magnificent acting career is that he very seldomly appeared in comedies while he was known as a humorous man in his personal life. For his portrayal of the grubby retired professor Norman Thayer Jr. in On Golden Pond (1981) he finally won an Oscar.

4) James Dean (1931-1955)

Countless books have been published and films have been released on James Dean, its subjects varying from the man behind the legend, his sexual preferences, his so-called death wish and his role as a symbol of the disillusioned youth. With a legacy of only three films, Dean played characters who embodied loneliness, frustration and anger to whom a young audience (the post war generation) could identify. He was educated in the Method Acting style, like his idol Marlon Brando, and because of his troubled youth (his mother, of whom he was very fond, died when he was 9) he could empathize with his characters very easily. As Dean proofed in his roles as Cal Trask in Elia Kazan's East of Eden (1955) in the emotionally charged scenes when he tries to win his father's (Raymond Massey) respect or as the misunderstood adolescent Jim Stark in Nicolas Ray's Rebel Without a Cause (1955) who forms a 'surrogate family'. In his final role (before his tragic car accident) as Jett Rink in George Steven's epic melodrama Giant (1956) he also showed his capability to play middle-aged men.

3) Humphrey Bogart (1899-1957)

Humphrey Bogart who would become a legend with his roles as the snarling and sardonic P.I.'s Phillip Marlowe and Sam Spade started his acting career in the Twenties on Broadway. He had a breakthrough with his performance in the film The Petrified Forest (he already played in the stage version the year before) in 1936, as the savaged Duke Mantee (inspired by John Dillinger). In the Forties he became one of the most dominating actors in Hollywood with excellent performances in High Sierra (1941), The Maltese Falcon (1941), Casablanca (1942), The Big Sleep (1946), Key Largo (1948), The Treasure of Sierra Madre (1948) and The African Queen (1951). Bogart played the character at the end of his career, such as Dead Reckoning (1947), in a lonely place (1950) and The Harder They Fall (1956) have been bitter, self-loathing types and their most daring and Original.

2) James Cagney (1899-1986)

The thesis that a roll of film must be to a projection of the personality of the protagonist, is particularly suitable for James Cagney. His ability to portray, heroes, villains and fun with a psychotic selfish electrifying energy, only inthe history of cinema. His first leading role in William Wellman, The Public Enemy (1931) as a gangster Tom Powers has made him a star while. In later years he continued to play gangsters (Angels With Dirty Faces (1938), Roaring Twenties (1939) for Warner Brothers studios, which were known for their raw and realistic images. In 1942, Cagney won an Oscar for Best actor for his role in the musical Yankee Doodle Dandy, who has shown his diversity. Following the comedy One, Two, ThreeIn 1961, he was pulled back only once in the film Ragtime (1981) as authoritative police chief Waldo.

1) Marlon Brando (1924-2004)

What is striking, impressive career of Marlon Brando that he performed unnecessary in a lot of movies. The actor, who would greatly influence actors like James Dean, Robert De Niro, Jack Nicholson, Paul Newman and many others, his method of acting derived from the Stanislavski system. Brando was one of the first members of theActors Studio by Lee Strasberg and Elia Kazan founded. With Kazan, Streetcar Named desire has held (1951), the charismatic but violent Ed Kowalski (nominated for an Academy Award as best actor), he is already based in the Broadway version of the book of the same name by Tennessee Williams plays had portrayed. In later years, his roles in Viva Zapata! (1952), were Julius Caesar (1953) and On the Waterfront (1954) all for an Oscar nomination as Best Actor (8-timesThroughout his career), with the latter won. In 1961 he directed and starred in the quirky Western One-Eyed Jacks, Stanley Kubrick to withdraw from the project, along with his lifelong friend, Karl Malden. In the seventies he returned with a performance in the iconic The Godfather (1972), The Last Tango in Paris (1972) and Apocalypse Now (1976). After these films, Brando was short, expensive and full of irony. His last major role was in a White Season(1989), in which he played a human rights lawyer who fought against the apartheid system in South Africa.

Top 10 most important leaders of Hollywood actors of all time

Klipsch Rs Quickly

Casino Food 101

!9# Casino Food 101

[if ]

[endif]

Over the years, and several gambling casinos or casinos to be a change, making the experience riskier, adventurous and unique. An often overlooked, yet important element in the whole casino experience is the food. The city's casinos have to offer a variety of buffets and joints to its tourist population. Cities like Las Vegas, Atlantic and Monte Carlo are revolutionizing their diet.

Las Vegas, the God of all gamblingThe cities were drawn by only a city of casinos now a recreation center complete. The primary objective of the city for centuries had casinos. Incidentally, the whole experience was the food chain. As a result, has lost many of its tourists who were not serious players. Investors and casino owners have realized that soon catch up with state lotteries and Indian casinos, they need to diversify. Many resorts and casinos now have to promise a complete holiday. This is notenough, restaurants with celebrity chefs have to offer the world a wide range of dishes. While Caesar's Palace now has two dozen restaurants, Bellagio is one of the best cuisines of the place. Numerous other joints restaurants offer a mix of various cuisines, such as olives, which is exotic Mediterranean - American dishes on the menu.

Vegas also has the famous restaurant Emeril Lagasse. The renowned chef who has a whole series of kitchen accessoriesattributed to him, opened the New Orlean's Fish House at the MGM Grand Hotel. The menu consists mainly of seafood. Delmonico Steak House is another great experience for its bar and cigar collection known. This Lagasse brainwave specializes in steaks.

Wolfgang Puck is another brand in food design. Opened Spago, a chain of hotels in Las Vegas, Puck began his career in 1992. This popular chain is synonymous with wealth and style. Located in Caesars Palace, this hotel offersboth, light dishes and dinner. The menu includes oven-baked pizzas and pasta. Postrio another one of Puck establishments offer the New American menu. The list includes fish and seafood. It also has a good selection of wines. Other Puck restaurants in Las Vegas include Lupo and Chinois.

A factor that perhaps forced Atlantic City to connect to "new casino experience 'was its geographic location. Seen in New York and Connecticut have both an escalation in the number of casinosin recent years. This in turn has forced many players to stay at home this weekend and visit your joints. The first step in the evolution of the front of the Atlantic City casinos was the opening of a casino site cum in 2003. The buffet of fish in the Atlantic are similar to those found in Las Vegas. Caesars Palace is the site of a series of award-winning restaurants of the city. Some of them include the Primavera, which is heavily dominated by Italian Cuisine, Bacchanal which is a mini-Rom,and Nero's Grill, a steak and the famous sea food.

Monte Carlo is located between France and Italy, along the French Riviera. The city is a luxury niche, which advertises its luxurious gambling experience. It offers various villas and secluded beaches, the comfort of Europe. Louis XV, a name that is synonymous with wealth, royalty and prestige is an exclusive dining experience. The menu consists of fish and vegetables cooked in French style of the region. Le Grill, anotherRestaurant, known for its Mediterranean view has grilled fish to his diet list.

For years, the targets of game fish and cheap buffet for serious players to visit these cities offered. The new resort concept, with its dining rooms plus kitchen, now promise something more than slot machines offer.

Casino Food 101

Lg Le5300 Save

Chazz Palminteri brings the streets of the Bronx at Caesars Atlantic City on July 9 to 27

!9# Chazz Palminteri brings the streets of the Bronx at Caesars Atlantic City on July 9 to 27

It is never too late for his father. Every day should be Father's Day. Here's the perfect gift. Chazz Palminteri's Bronx. Chazz is at Caesars Atlantic City from July 9 to 27 from July.

Chazz Palminteri brings the streets of the Bronx at Caesars Atlantic City on July 9 to 27

Order Summer Infant Slim Monitor !9# Clif Bar Blowout Sale Yo Gabba Gabba Muno Costume This Instant

Blackjack Super System: Money Management Chapter

!9# Blackjack Super System: Money Management Chapter

[if ]

[endif]

"Common sense is not so common." -Voltaire

Money Management

If you are going to make money at blackjack, you need to better manage your money. It 'easy to do if you have the discipline. Money management is crucial. The basic strategy and betting progression is essential. If a player follows these three things, he or she has the potential to be a winner and world-class players to be.

In this chapter the example of a 100-dollar bet. If you have a $ 5 or $ 10 minimum-time onlyAdjusting the numbers.

One of the worst things that can happen is that a player runs out of money. Increase knowledge and according to the guidelines in the system of super blackjack, your odds of staying in action. The nature of blackjack is that sometimes, there are considerable fluctuations in victory or defeat. Fluctuations in relation to gambling is called standard deviation or normal wear. They will come from knowing which of course is in favor of playing blackjack and use of this informationTheir benefits.

Players who follow the guidelines in this chapter have a better chance of winning and less chance of beating. Whenever you have more than one bet, you have a better chance to withstand normal fluctuations inherent in blackjack. You can follow the money management guidelines in this chapter. You can follow the guidelines for money management in Chapter 8 (short-game bankroll). You can change the size of your bets in the middle. Only understand the possible outcomeTheir actions. Read the last question and answer in chapter 14 (Frequently Asked Questions) for the standard deviation.

Suppose, to make our minimum target is $ 100-bets. This was our typical $ 1,000 buy-in. Total bankroll set aside for gambling, would be $ 50,000. For the average person, this is a lot to put aside money for a cause. The money should not be made in cash or chips. could be invested in equities or money market instruments
Suppose further that aPlayer has set aside $ 50,000 for his project Black Jack has studied and mapped, and has played 100 pieces of training sessions. Now this player's first two-day trip to a casino floor. Therefore, he should bring $ 2,500 to play. Five times out of ten, times the minimum bet of $ 50. I know I said I would continue to use for a minimum amount of $ 100, but there is a reason for that.

Since we are just at the beginning of this project is to ensure that we do not start from scratch in a long period of lossTrend. We do everything we can to get valuable asset. Less than $ 2,500 for a two-day trip is 5% of your total bankroll. Professional traders do not exceed these products are short-term risk, and should not be.

We take three typical scenarios that can happen:

You win by 1

2 They also remain on

3 You start to lose

1 begin to win.

Suppose that after a few trips to the casino, we won. Now we are looking at $ 1,500. Now we have a totalBankroll of $ 51,500. Now that we have before us, we can put our increase to normal levels. This is done by ex-casino-money. Our minimum bets are now $ 100. Our two-day trip is $ 5,000 bankroll. This breaks down to five sessions of ten units for $ 100.

Two-day trip:

Five sessions, $ 1,000 per session, $ 100 minimum bets

Continues to rely on that level as long as you stay on your bankroll of $ 50,000.
At this level of competition, if you lose $ 3,000 in two days gamesout for the day. If you need to spend $ 5,000 for the trip, you made your stop-loss for this trip. I'm ready to play, said travel.

There are still about 2 ($ 50,000 bankroll)

Some players end up having to play even after a few months. Once again to be sure, you bet $ 50 if your total bankroll to $ 50,000 or less. Every chance we get we get the capital we do.

Suppose that your bankroll is $ 53,000 after a victory. Now you can increase your bets$ 100 minimum bets. If you go on a two-day tour, you take $ 5,000. With $ 53,000 you are risking $ 2,000 and $ 3,000 the original capital of ex-casino-money.

You start to lose 3.

As already mentioned, at any time your bankroll of $ 50,000 or below, your bet to $ 50. Suppose you are in a negative long-term trend. Every time your bankroll drops below $ 40,000, you can bet at least $ 25. To make the negative fluctuations in their own way, and positive. Not under the impression that onlyhappen to someone else.

If your bankroll falls below $ 40,000, cut your trips to casinos in two halves. Do this until you start winning. If your bankroll back up to $ 40,000, then you can increase your bets to $ 50 and get to travel back to normal casinos. You want to cut your trips to the casino and drop the bet size can greatly reduce the risk.

If you should increase to $ 75,000 bankroll, you might consider your bets over a minimum of 50% ($ 150). AnotherAlternatively, you could wait until it reaches $ 100,000, and then double your minimum bets ($ 200).

When you win like this, check you can play more often. Double your travel (or more) and increasing your bets can be very profitable in this positive normal fluctuations.

Raising the stakes, how to increase your bankroll and decrease your bets as you decrease your bankroll, you are on the Kelly criterion formula. This formula is to use what the professional playersdetermine their optimal use. The guidelines in this section are a simplified version.

Adjust the numbers in this section to fit your entire bankroll. We covered when
Play to Stop when they lose. Then, when we go on playing to win on slop. We can, more than two examples, the start has cost me over $ 30,000 just two steps. This was attributed to
The levels of betting in this chapter.

The first painful event happened at Caesars Palace in 1979. I had played for twoDays before and it was $ 13,000. What was I supposed to do at this point was to get to my next stop $ 10,000. Instead, I kept playing and won the $ 13,000 plus another $ 10,000. Do not put a stop to the first $ 10,000, it cost me $ 20,000.

Ten years later, at the Trump Plaza in Atlantic City, I did the same thing. This time I was over $ 8,000 after the first day. I could not lose. I enjoyed every session. I was temporarily invincible. Then the tide turned. I could not win a single session. I lost at least tensessions of law. This trip was to test my self-esteem. I should play, etc. (see Chapter 12: Mental Edge).

Not by me using my first stop at $ 5,000, it cost me another $ 10,000. I ended up losing $ 5,000, $ 5,000 if I had had before him.

You go to the casino to win money. Once you're ahead, you've reached your goal. You win when you play with the bus stop is ahead. Do not move the bus stops outside the self. Keep playing until you hit either a win or a stopStop-Loss.

Do not waste time with long-term statistics of millions of hands. There are the advantages of short-term fluctuations.

Enter your firm similar to these examples. Stop playing, when you reach a stop.

If you're planning a day excursion to the casino, make your stop-loss for a day at $ 3,000. This is assuming you are right on your total bankroll of $ 50,000. Your day trip to three sessions with a break every $ 1,000 $ 100 minimumBetting.

A day:

3 sessions
10 each, $ 1,000 per session
$ 100 minimum bets
If your bankroll is less than $ 50,000, you place your bets as follows:

A day:

3 sessions of 10 each, $ 500 per session $ 50 minimum bets

At this point in the chapter, you should understand:

1 Total Bankroll requirements
2 Two days bankroll requirements
A 3 day bankroll requirements
4 stop placing stop-loss and victories
5 stakes risingdeviations during long-term positive
6 Betting fall during long-term adverse deviations

Now let's look at an example of what area of ​​the win-loss ratio you can look at the casino for a day:

Win-loss ratio for a day

Win (s) fall (s)

0-3

1-4

2-4

3-3

4-2

5-1

6-6

7-1

In the first example, we lost three times and won none. This means that we do our stop loss for the day and are ready to play thatDay.

The next example is when we won four and lost one session. Suppose that the dollar amount lost in this system, we have $ 4,000 for these four sessions. The session we won, they are usually $ 1,000 to $ 4,000. The average income is about $ 1,600. If our only victory was only $ 1,000, we lost $ 3,000 per day and we hit our stop loss. If our session only win was $ 1,600, we can $ 600 buy-in is needed for $ 600, if another game session.

If our only winSession was $ 2,000, we would have lost $ 2,000 for the day. If another session of play is desired, the buy-in of $ 1,000.

Meeting our maximum loss is 10 units (or $ 1,000). Do not miss any time exceed a total of 30 units in one day. We do not limit our wins anyway.

Let's look at the latest example of seven wins and a defeat for the day for research. The loss amounts to $ 1,000 (7 average gain x $ 1,600), the victory would be $ 11,200 for a total win of $ 10,200 in total.

The method we follow for your loss limit for eachgiven day. As you can gather from the win-loss ratio, we simply do not know the winner. Our average loss of our average earnings progression betting system and there it stops. Each piece is cut in a single session.
Let us turn our plot, assuming the average profit is $ 1600 in forward.

Win-Loss Ratio for the day
(With a total of $)

Wins Losses Total $ for the day

0-3 - $ 3,000

1-4 - $ 2,400

2-4 - $ 800

3-3 + $ 1,800

4-2 + $ 4,400

5-1+ $ 7,000

6-6 + $ 3,600

7-1 + $ 10,200

As you can see from the chart above, you must:

1 Cut your losses.

2 have an average income higher than the average loss. These are bets that the progression in Chapter 6.

Play more than 3 sessions during the day, you win.

In addition to the following guidelines to ensure that you are with money you can afford to play. Bet within your means. And 'more difficult to win bets fear.

Play only if youFully rested. It takes great concentration to play like a pro. Stay away from alcohol to excess before the start of a game round. Do at least half an hour break between sessions. This is particularly important after a quick loss or after a big win. Expect to lose sessions. Expect to lose a series of meetings. Just like a six-party meetings, they happen. Play every session, regardless of other sessions! You can never get to play, too. Play only if the conditions are perfect for you. Tailoredright for you. Enjoy playing blackjack, as a serious matter. Do not donate money to the casino. Do not feel obligated to play more hands (or less), as it is right for you.

Everything in this chapter (and the rest of Blackjack Super System) is the exact opposite of what the casino wants you to do. To better manage your money! I hate casinos.

Updates in 2011:

Blackjack Super System was written in 2000. 11 years ago. There have been some changes in the alreadylast ten years. The only change I would make in order to leave the meeting after losing four consecutive hands. That seems to limit the risk of loss, during the execution of evil. Also, I am now buying units with 8 instead of 10

Anyone can add an element of this system incorporating, will receive their purchase price back, with pleasure. I will notify all the other buyers of any additions as well. Most of the things I heard are not useful, but try.

When you get to about 8 unitsTable, do not hesitate to have 4 of these chips to the side. 4 If you lose, you can stop to win the session with a 4-unit. This is a conservative way to play and be very careful with your bankroll. Or you may simply be trying to reach a minimum of 10 units of victory.

I'll be back at the tables with a small bankroll due to circumstances not related to blackjack.

I go to the casino with a bankroll of 20 units days. In this case is $ 500. My first and second buy-in is 8 units.If I lose both sessions and have not got that four-game losing streak, to be my third buy-in for the day 4 units stopped. In this way limit the losses. If I had won out and stopped a previous session for the day, my third buy-in would be 8 units. I will continue to play, stop, or, after the rest of this chapter.

Someone asked me how this system worked for me. It 'been a good question. Except the one that appeared in the book, head to head with the dealer. This may, or may not, make aDifference, but that's the way I played. I liked that long term gain of occasional papers. You can not think for a half-full or full-table as a shuffle is too often. I mostly played solo against the dealer with a 6-deck.

If I bought it with 8 units, it is my goal to keep to a minimum of 18 units. I could lower the size of the unit to ensure a win for that session. For example, if I had 20 units, and possibly point to 8 units for the course, I would just 2 units. I sat down to winthe session and not to endanger, dass Once I had the 18 units at the site of betting would increase as the 2, 4, 8 in this example consists of the 8 units max bet size.

Notes from a professional:

One of the most important things to do, a player needs to cut its losses. If you have never created a loss, press again to get your bets. Do not chase a loss. Decrease your bets when they lose.

Finally a winner in the long run, you must press your bets when you win. You must alsokeep most of those to win. This is done by stop-points (stations).

Blackjack Super System: Money Management Chapter

Low Price Schecter Diamond Series Bass